Prime relations research

For this presentation the following studies are shown:

prime links composite links divisor divisors orbit graph prime gaps graph

All nodes are color coded according to their number of divisors.

Conclusions

This study shows that the two Goldbach based graphs are very different for the divisor based ones, the latter having a structure that resembles a fractal.

The number of divisors property has shown to be a very strong grouping property, as in second study the number of divisors where closely related to the orbit length.

Some number properties have easily been spotted in the two divisor based studies: powers of numbers stayed close to the same nodes.

A surprising fact is the similarity between the prime gaps and the divisors graphs, certainly this is a topic for further invetigation.

Further studies

Degree distribution

An important measure for graph classification is the distribution of degrees, On the first sight, Goldbach based graphs have more distributed links, whereas divisor function based graphs have nodes with concentrated links.

Mean degree change with number of nodes

Mean degree is the "central" indicator for the study of graph centrality, the Goldbach based graphs show much lower centrality than the divisors based, studying how the centrality changes when a new node is added is on topic for extending.

Orbit length

One interesting study is to model the length of the orbit with the number of nodes.

Relation between the divisors of composite numbers and the Goldbach primes

The second graph needs a more deep study to discover if there is a relation between the number of divisors of a composite number and the 2 primes that add to it.

The first question to be answered in this case is: which pair of primes to use? As the number of ways of summing to an even composite number increases, which pair should be considered, here the pair with the least prime was chosen.